Chapter 6: Norms, Surprises, & Causes
in sum:
- our mind can rep. the structure of the world by associative links —vast networkof various types of ideas — the spreading activation in assoc. machine is auto’
- but we (S2) can control to search memory, & program memory to look for & direct attnetion to certain items in the environ’t
Assessing Normality
- main function of S1 is to maintain & update a model of your personal world — model rep’s what is normal in it — made of assoc’ns linking ideas of circumst’s, events, actions, outcomes that occur together w. some regularity, occur together or near in time — links form, strengthen à rep’n of structure of events in your life, determines your interp’n of present & expect’ns of future.
- Surpise is v. impt.
- 2 kinds of expect’n: (a) active, conscious (e.g. waiting for event), (b) passive expect’n, not waiting but not surprised, normal event
- just one event can alter what seems normal — “How many animals of each kind did Moses take into the ark?” Biblical context makes name Moses (wrong) seem normal
- detect’n of abnormality is v. fast — even when req’ing much knowl., e.g. upper-class voice says, “I have a large tattoo on my back”
- norms, share w. others to enable communic’n
- S1 accesses norms of categories, knows range of plausible values, most typical cases
Seeing Causes and Intentions
- S1 sorts out causes, constructs coherent story — e.g. “Fred’s parents arrived late. The caterers were expected soon. Fred was angry.”
- S1’s story can be erroneous — e.g. day Saddam captured, Bloomberg News service first headline: U.S. Treasuries Rise; Hussein Capture May Not Curb Terrorism, 30 min. later bond prices fell, headline: U.S. Treasuries Fall; Hussein Capture Boosts Allure Of Risky Assets
- e.g. “After spending a day exploring beautiful sights in the crowded streets of New York, Jane discovered that her wallet was missing.” à stronger assoc. w. word ‘pickpocket’ than word ‘sights’ — S1 constructs story
- we (S1) perceive causality (cf. Kant, the mind imposes causality on our perceptions) — e.g. film of shapes “pushing” each other, chasing, cowering, i.e. physical causality, also intentional causality
- source of religion here? S1 separating physical & intentional causality à disembodied self, mind, soul
- N.B.
intuition of causality very impt. à often apply causal think wrongly, esp. when statistics is
appropr.— S1 not statistical (S2 can be trained to think statistically)
Speaking of Norms & Causes
·
“When the second applicant also
turned out to be an old friend of mine, I wasn’t quite as surprised. Very
little repetition is needed for a new experience to feel normal!”
·
“When we survey the reaction to
these products, let’s make sure we don’t focus exclusively on the average. We
should consider the entire range of normal reactions.”
·
“She can’t accept that she was
just unlucky; she needs a causal story. She will end up thinking that someone
intentionally sabotaged her work.”
For some reason I am unable to relate the second quote (“When we survey the reaction to these products, let’s make sure we don’t focus exclusively on the average. We should consider the entire range of normal reactions.”) to what I learned in the chapter. Which leads me to believe I'm not grasping important parts of the chapter.
ReplyDeleteIs the quote referencing the soup example where it would seem normal that the average response to an event might be wrong? For example, the average response to "Moses' Ark" is wrong, therefore it would be more helpful to look at the other reactions?
I hope someone reads this and can help explain this.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteWell I am reading this after almost 4 years. And to be honest I am also having trouble understanding this particular statement.
Delete